ARMY HISTORICAL SERIES skilled work made this a much finer book. In conclusion, I wish to dedicate this book to the finest soldiers. An Essay on Ways & Means for Raising Money for the Support of the Present War , Questia, subs. Armamentarium: The Book of Roman Arms & Armour, This sixth edition, 4th revision of Military History for Canadian Students has been published miliar. A very brief list of books for further reading is also included.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Indonesian|
|Genre:||Academic & Education|
|ePub File Size:||26.79 MB|
|PDF File Size:||16.70 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
Books on military history and armament. the ocean, far from home. This short, but well-illustrated book is available as a free downloadable PDF. (Click below.). PDF | Alex Roland and others published INTRODUCTION TO MILITARY HISTORY. number of these books are available in different editions, please attend to. (Army historical series). Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. United States—History, Military. 2. United States. Army—History.
Rose, What is Gender History? In both fictional and non-fictional forms, the appeal of writing about war remains. Showing results: But we hope to provide newcomers to the field with a reliable roadmap that will make further explorations more comprehensible and thus more enjoyable. Stephen Morillo with Michael F.
In most places, by the time writing was invented, there were already kings and armies. It did not take long for kings to recognize the value of the new communication technology in publicizing and thus glorifying their exploits.
A ruler with a good military publicist appeared favored by the gods. Military history is therefore the oldest form of historical writing in many cultures. It has long since ceased to be the exclusive preserve of publicists for great leaders, although such types certainly still exist in abundance and the genre has produced some great literature, especially if one considers epics such as The Iliad as a form of military history.
Indeed, it ceased to be the preserve of publicists in antiquity, when some of the finest minds in a number of classical civilizations turned to writing history, the history of wars in particular, partly in reaction to the tradition of heroic epics.
Their more analytical approach to the study of history did not replace popular war tales, but coexisted with it. In both fictional and non-fictional forms, the appeal of writing about war remains. In many places today, military history continues to be one of the most popular sorts of history and of non-fiction generally.
This popularity still extends beyond the written word, just as it did in the days of oral traditions of war tales such as The Iliad: Yet that very popularity means that there are many types of military history and a sometimes overwhelming volume of publications.
The quality of this outpouring is inevitably uneven, and military history has not always enjoyed a high reputation in academic circles, for reasons we will explore further elsewhere in this book. The popularity of military history therefore complicates the problem of getting to know the field. Where does a student just embarking on their study of military history begin to understand this deep and complex tradition of historical writing?
First, what is military history about? And second, who studies T1 military history and why do they do so? Morillo—What is Military History?
Definitions, Topics, Scope We adopt a broad definition of military history. At the core of the field, of course, are histories of war — both particular wars and warfare the conduct of military operations more generally.
The historian can look at a war in terms of how it fits into the larger politi- cal aims of a country or leader, what strategies leaders adopted to fit their larger aims, how and how well those strategies were executed, or what the results of the war were — that is, histories of particular wars and warfare are part of the larger topic of histories of war in all its complex mani- festations and effects. The focus at any of these levels might be on the decisions made by leaders, the institutions that put those decisions into operation, the experience of individuals far from the decision-making process but close to the action generated by the decisions, or the world of ideas, beliefs, and ideologies, including religious beliefs and practices, that shaped the plans, decisions, and actions of individuals and groups.
Nor do such varied approaches to the narration and analysis of warfare exhaust the possibilities of military history. Military institu- tions, in other words, are as much the province of military history as are military actions. This is particularly true since institutional history subsumes the history of military orga- nization, unit structures, and allocations of equipment.
Like- wise, the varying roles of soldiers and warriors in different societies and the social impact of warfare — whether directly through the interaction of combatants with non-combatants or indirectly through taxation, conscription, and other effects associated with the intrusion into societies of states and organized violence — have become central to much mili- tary history.
The basic constraints placed on warfare and those who wage it by deep factors such as environment, T1 Morillo—What is Military History? Technology, science, and the impact of war on individuals intersect in the history of military medicine.
And the very popularity of war tales in many cultures indicates just one of the ways in which warfare, military institutions, and military values including warrior codes of behavior interact with the cultural values and constructs of different societies, bringing cultural analy- ses of war and warriors into the debate.
Furthermore, both social structures and cultural constructs, including gender roles, affect the ways armies are raised, how they fight, and how they interact with society more broadly.
In other words, the relationship between war and military institutions on one hand and society and culture on the other is reciprocal. We therefore arrive at a broad definition of military history that encompasses not just the history of war and wars, but that includes any historical study in which military personnel of all sorts, warfare the way in which conflicts are actually fought on land, at sea, and in the air , military institutions, and their various intersections with politics, economics, society, nature, and culture form the focus or topic of the work.
One obvious implication of such a broad definition is that many works of military history could also be classified variously as political, economic, institutional, intellectual, social, or cultural history. Indeed the best history, military and otherwise, necessarily crosses many of these abstract academic boundaries in order to present as rich and rounded a view of the past as possible.
In practice, military history has benefited from methodological advances and insights derived from other subfields of history, as well as from separate but related academic fields such as anthropology, sociology, and literary criticism.
Historiography is the study of the history of historical writing; one of its basic principles is that while histories can be divided by their central intellectual or topical approaches, the historical categories used are not clear and compartmentalized, but overlap across fuzzy boundaries.
One reason history gets divided up into subfields is for convenience of historiographical analysis. Historical writing really does fall into recognizable groupings, even if the group- ings can be rearranged if viewed from a different angle, just as any set of historical data can be divided up depending on the interests of the particular historian. But another reason is that many of the practitioners of historical writing since the mid-nineteenth century have become increasingly profes- sionalized in specific ways that contribute to specialization and subdivision.
Historians working within academic institu- tions — colleges, universities, and research institutes — are especially prone to specify their areas of specialization for a variety of reasons that include the utility of such divisions for historical research in an age of ever-increasing informa- tion, but are also influenced by academic politics, the inter- ests of sources for funding research, and the workings of academic job markets.
The subfield of military history is further complicated by such dynamics because a significant amount of military history writing, because of its attraction to popular audiences, has always come from outside of aca- demic institutions. Who Studies Military History and Why? The audiences for military history have changed over time, with significant implications for who has written military history and why. First is the popular audience, those readers in the general population who are interested in military history as recreational reading.
This has long been and continues to be a large and therefore economically significant group — a mass market, at least potentially — whose attractions draw writers not just from among academics and professional military personnel but also from professional authors and popularizers who happen to choose military topics for their marketability.
We include in this cate- gory both professional academics whose specialty is military history and who read to keep up with developments in the field and in support of their own research and writing, and students at both the undergraduate and graduate levels whose reading of military history is presumably more focused and guided than that of the popular audience and is directly related to advancement of their academic careers.
In this category, the audience and the practitioners, that is those who write military history, are often the same people, though the most influential military history writing usually appeals to both a scholarly or academic audience and to a popular audience.
John Keegan, one of the most successful academic historians to reach the mass market, eventually gave up his teaching post at Sandhurst Military Academy to write full time.
As a result, some of this Professional Military Education PME literature is more technical and practice-oriented though not necessarily less theoretically informed than purely academic military history tends to be, as it is likely to have the most direct impact on the making of military policy and the imple- mentation of military action by states and their armies.
On the other hand, to bring this introductory discussion of prac- titioners and audiences full circle, a traditional sort of mili- tary history author has been the retired military officer who uses the credibility of both his military experience and his advertisable rank as entryways to the mass popular market.
Keegan, for example, felt it necessary to explain, in his Introduction to The Face of Battle, what he could bring to military history despite his lack of direct military experience. The practical uses of military history for professional mili- tary personnel and the civilian governments that direct mili- tary activity today provide the clearest and most direct illustration of an important and general historiographical principle: In other words, military history, like all history, is a dialogue between past and present.
Because the present is constantly changing, views of the past change constantly as well. In short, the impact of Gulf War I on American military thought, with its emphasis on high technology and tactics, has been overshadowed by T1 Morillo—What is Military History?
This shift has obvious implications for the sorts of histori- cal evidence historians engaged in these debates will bring to bear on their arguments.
The relevant historical parallels and examples in the debate over the Revolution in Military Affairs involved other supposed cases of rapid technological and tactical change, especially the spread of gunpowder weap- onry in sixteenth-century Europe again, this is discussed at more length in chapter 4.
Such cases are chosen to gain insight into a contemporary situation in which dis- parities of technology and force do not have the same impact that they have had on the conventional battlefields of the past, including those cases highlighted by the earlier debate, and in which social and cultural factors seemingly outweigh traditional political relationships between states.
In both debates, however, the historical cases chosen as evidence for one argument or another are subject to rejection, reinterpretation, or revision by other historians who either see the problems of the present differently or see the crucial characteristics of the past differently, or both.
Both debates, for instance, are much more central to military history pub- lished in the United States than elsewhere, since the concerns of other states that are neither the undisputed leaders in military technology nor likely to be seen as a new global Roman Empire are different from those of the US, which fits both criteria. Historians who do not share those concerns will bring a different perspective to both debates or will engage in other debates entirely. But more impor- tantly, even if historical data prove incapable of decisively answering a current question history never, after all, exactly repeats itself, though, as Mark Twain once said, it does rhyme , the fact that historians have, as a result of current concerns, asked new questions about the past leads to new understandings of the past.
This is in part because not all interpretations of the past are mutually exclusive: This is a nice result even if it makes drawing lessons from such complex understandings even harder since lessons often need to be simple to be applicable.
In short, history, including military history, can be used to entertain; it can contribute to and advance academic careers, it can even perhaps teach lessons. But above all, given the prevalence of military activity in the past actions of humanity, it can help us understand the past and how we got to where we are today, even if the implications of that route for the future remain necessarily contentious. Additionally included is a new introduction with bibliographic details by Joseph A.
This is a fascinating first-hand account of an officer in a small motorized anti-tank unit that tried to harry and slow down the invasion of France by the German war machine in early World War II. Fighting Germans, sleep fatigue, and spies, French and British units lost many men.
Gerard gives an honest appraisal of the situation, noting difficulties with red tape and inexperienced higher-ranking officers. This book is easy-to-read, and a great introduction to an important point in world history. Basing his essay upon the thesis that modern war must be fought on three fronts, the military, the economic and the propagandist, he has given a comprehensive account of the direction of the third front in the World War.
His bibliography is extensive, including more than a hundred books and articles of recent date upon the specific propaganda of the World War, or in general discussion of public opinion inspired by it. Harold D. While the examples focus on the First World War, the principles and patterns carry over to modern day warfare, politics, business, and social movements. We undergo a constant barrage of overt and covert propaganda, which can only be effectively countered by recognizing it and understanding its function.
This well-written book is both objective and discerning while explaining how and why propaganda works. Edward K. Strong, Jr. This is the fascinating inside story of a British man who was recruited by the Russians to spy on Germany during World War 2 from neutral Switzerland. Foote ran his own network, and provides details on operational procedures along with stories of hiding from German officers and Swiss police, countering double agents, transmitting war information to the Russian "Centre," his capture, his interrogations in Russia upon release, and finally his escape back to Britain.
As a spy, Foote passed along vital information for the campaign against the Nazis, but slowly realized that Russia was as great a threat to freedom and to his personal safety as were the Nazis. First published in , this is a terrific classic addition to a WWII or espionage enthusiast's library.
Seven classic papers are compiled and reprinted in this anthology of primitive weapons technology, describing styles, creation, and usage of boomerangs, slings, spear-throwers, harpoons, blowguns, and throwing sticks. Most are illustrated. These are primarily anthropological papers, with an emphasis on specimens in collections, but there is a good deal of practical and historical information for the primitive weapons enthusiast. Papers included are: Numerous engravings accompany this popularly-written article.
This article was published in Archaeologia in An early collection of stories alleged to have been told by Abraham Lincoln himself. The American victory at Yorktown brought to an end a long war with Britain, while the circumstances and events leading to this point shaped for better or worse the character of a new nation.
Significant characters and events during the war, and especially as they relate to the Siege at Yorktown, are described in detail. This collection of essays and speeches was originally written for the membership of the National Society, Sons of the American Revolution, during the early s and received limited distribution.
This is the first reprint of these fascinating papers. A reviled president, lackluster leadership, battle tactics both inept and brilliant, profiteering with the enemy, threats of secession, warfare by public opinion, political blustering Originally published as chapters in Adams' multi-volume History of the United States , in the late s, they were collected for this volume in It provides a thorough and fascinating overview of a rarely-discussed war between the United States and the British Empire.
Professor F. Adcock produced an interesting and readable account of the Greek and Macedonian art of war. Strategy and battle tactics of ground troops are discussed, along with specifics on naval warfare, the cavalry including those with elephants , siege warfare, and leadership on the battlefield.
Historians of military history and the ancient world will find this text an informative and useful resource. The use of the military tank was a turning point in modern warfare, and this fascinating text details the varieties developed for use by different nations during World War I. Their combat history during WWI is also given. A number of black and white photos and illustrations are given to complement the text.
This is a facsimile reprint of a book first published in